[Pacemaker] Clarification on pacemaker HA services

[Andrew Beekhof]

Did you subscribe before sending?

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Shridhar Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net> wrote:

>  Hi Andrew,
>
> I am not sure why the following mail didn't appear on the mailing list.
> Could you please help with some inputs?
>
> Regards,
> Shridhar
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------  Subject: Clarification on pacemaker
> HA services  Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:37:27 -0500  From: Shridhar
> Sahukar <ssahukar at movik.net> <ssahukar at movik.net>  Reply-To:
> ssahukar at movik.net  Organization: Movik Networks Pvt Ltd  To:
> pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I have worked with high availability middleware like OpenSAF, OpenAIS
> which are based on SAForum specifications. I have a requirement for a
> similar middleware that runs on top of corosync (more specifically the
> totem protocol implementation) and am considering using pacemaker
> (OpenAIS was a good fit, but since it is discontinued, I am looking for
> an alternative). I see that pacemaker can also support various
> redundancy models, but I am not sure if it provides functionality close
> to AMF functionality specified in SAForum specs.
>
> Could you please provide some comparison of pacemaker's features against
> an SAForum middleware in terms of HA support?
>
> Regards,
> Shridhar
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130104/f668fd5b/attachment-0003.html>