[Pacemaker] Putting a node to standby stops resources on the other node
Jake Smith
jsmith at argotec.com
Wed Feb 20 20:04:24 UTC 2013
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Lorenzen" <ki11er_bob at yahoo.dk>
> To: ms at sys4.de, "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:39:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Putting a node to standby stops resources on
> the other node
> Hi'
> Bingo, that seems to work. Still, I find it somewhat unexpected, that
> the order matters in such a colocation rule. Anyway, things now
> seems to work as expected. Thanks a very lot.
Your rule:
colocation backup_not_with_master -inf: master backup
requires that the cluster knows where backup is running to be able to place master. Since backup wasn't running it couldn't put master anywhere.
Now:
colocation backup_not_with_master -inf: backup master
Master can run anywhere and backup must only run where master isn't.
HTH
Jake
> Best regards.
> Thomas.
> Fra: Michael Schwartzkopff <ms at sys4.de>
> Til: Thomas Lorenzen <ki11er_bob at yahoo.dk>; The Pacemaker cluster
> resource manager <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sendt: 20:28 onsdag den 20. februar 2013
> Emne: Re: [Pacemaker] Putting a node to standby stops resources on
> the other node
> better:
> colocation backup_not_with_master -inf: backup master
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list