[Pacemaker] does adding a second ring actually work with cman?
Brian J. Murrell
brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Tue Dec 17 19:43:16 UTC 2013
On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 16:33 +0100, Florian Crouzat wrote:
>
> Is it possible that lotus-5vm8 (from DNS) and lotus-5vm8-ring1 (from
> /etc/hosts) resolves to the same IP (10.128.0.206) which could maybe
> confuse cman and make it decide that there is only one ring ?
No, they do resolve to two different IPs -- the respective IPs for the
interfaces.
The problem was just my misunderstanding that CMAN is not interactively
updating the live configuration but does indeed require a "service cman
re{load|start}" to activate that new ring configuration.
Cheers,
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20131217/5ef19842/attachment-0004.sig>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list