[Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2013-12-14T01:11:17, Vladislav Bogdanov <bubble at hoster-ok.com> wrote:

> > The idea was to offer an additional construct that provides both
> > properties, since *most of the time*, that's what users want. In the
> > interest of clarity and brevity in the configuration, this would be
> > quite useful.
> group?

groups can't be used with resource sets, template resources, resources
can only be in one group, they don't support roles, mix badly between
primitive/clone/m/s resources, they aggregate resources into a container
object, etc.

It's not the same as a "proper" constraint, even if indeed groups are
also a form of shorthand.


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde