[Pacemaker] crmsh: New syntax for location constraints, suggestions / comments

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2013-12-13T10:16:41, Kristoffer Grönlund <kgronlund at suse.com> wrote:

> Lars (lmb) suggested that we might switch to using the { } - brackets
> around resource sets everywhere for consistency. My only concern with
> that would be that it would be a breaking change to the previous crmsh
> syntax. Maybe that is okay when going from 1.x to 2.0, but it also
> makes me a bit nervous. :)

Yes, but consistency and syntax cleanups are important for 2.0.

Also, then we may finally be able to change the order for collocation
constraints as well ;-)


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde