[Pacemaker] Cluster with fc18 and fc17 nodes.

Francis SOUYRI francis.souyri at apec.fr
Fri Aug 23 09:33:05 UTC 2013


Hello,

About the nodes.

<node id="3232236029" uname="noeud1.xxxx.fr"/>
<node id="4261521600" uname="noeud2.xxxx.fr"/>

I have this in corosync.

Membership information
----------------------
     Nodeid      Votes Name
3232236029          1 noeud1.xxxx.fr (local)
4261521600          1 noeud2.xxxx.fr

So what is this ?

<node id="-33445696" uname="noeud2.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>
<node id="-1062731267" uname="noeud1.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>

Best regards.

Francis

On 08/23/2013 11:18 AM, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a long time I used heartbeat/drbd for 2 nodes clusters with Fedora,
> I used the internal crm of heartbeat not pacemaker.
>
> I planned to upgrade from the fc17 to the fc18, but on fc18 heartbeat is
> obsolete and I have to change to corosync/pacemaker.
> For information the heartbeat fc17 package work fine on fc18 and the
> cluster with a node fc17 and the other fc18 (without the firewall
> activated by default !!!) work perfectly (The final configuration is to
> have the both node in fc18).
>
> But the corosync/pacemaker do not work with a fc17 node and a fc18 node.
>
> I have these packages.
>
> drbd-pacemaker-8.4.2-1.fc17.i686
> pacemaker-libs-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686
> pacemaker-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686
> corosync-2.3.0-1.fc17.i686
> corosynclib-2.3.0-1.fc17.i686
> pacemaker-cli-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686
> pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.7-2.fc17.i686
>
> pacemaker-libs-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686
> pacemaker-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686
> drbd-pacemaker-8.4.2-1.fc18.i686
> pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686
> pacemaker-cli-1.1.9-0.1.70ad9fa.git.fc18.i686
> corosynclib-2.3.1-1.fc18.i686
> corosync-2.3.1-1.fc18.i686
>
> The corosync config :
>
> totem {
> version: 2
> secauth: off
> cluster_name: cluster
>     interface {
>           ringnumber: 0
>           bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.0
>           ttl: 1
>     }
> transport: udpu
> }
>
> nodelist {
>     node {
>           ring0_addr: noeud1.xxxx.fr
>          }
>     node {
>           ring0_addr: noeud2.xxxx.fr
>          }
> }
>
> quorum {
> provider: corosync_votequorum
> }
>
> logging {
> to_syslog: yes
> debug: off
> }
>
> A short time after starting pacemaker I have this.
>
> FC18 node:
>
> Corosync Nodes:
>    noeud1.xxxx.fr noeud2.xxxx.fr
> Pacemaker Nodes:
>    noeud1.xxxx.fr noeud1.xxxx.fr noeud2.xxxx.fr noeud2.xxxx.fr
>
> <node id="-33445696" uname="noeud2.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>
> <node id="-1062731267" uname="noeud1.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>
> <node id="3232236029" uname="noeud1.xxxx.fr"/>
> <node id="4261521600" uname="noeud2.xxxx.fr"/>
>
> Why four nodes ?!? What are the nodes 3232236029 and 4261521600 ?
>
> FC17 node:
>
> Corosync Nodes:
>    noeud1.xxxx.fr noeud2.xxxx.fr
> Pacemaker Nodes:
>    noeud1.xxxx.fr noeud2.xxxx.fr
>
> <node id="-33445696" uname="noeud2.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>
> <node id="-1062731267" uname="noeud1.xxxx.fr" type="normal"/>
>
> On the FC17 I have some messages like this "error: cib_perform_op:
> Discarding update with feature set '3.0.7' greater than our own '3.0.6'".
> On the FC18 "warning: cib_process_replace: Replacement 0.5.4 from
> noeud2.xxxx.fr not applied to 0.9.0: current epoch is greater than the
> replacement"
>
> Pacemaker 1.1.7 and 1.1.9 are not compatible ?
>
> Best regards.
>
> Francis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list