[Pacemaker] [Problem][crmsh]The designation of the 'ordered' attribute becomes the error.

[Andreas Kurz]

Hi Dejan,

On 2013-03-06 11:59, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi Hideo-san,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 10:37:44AM +0900, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>> Hi Dejan,
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> As for the crm shell, the check of the meta attribute was revised with the next patch.
>>
>>  * http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/crmsh/rev/d1174f42f4b3
>>
>> This patch was backported in Pacemaker1.0.13.
>>
>>  * https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker-1.0/commit/fa1a99ab36e0ed015f1bcbbb28f7db962a9d1abc#shell/modules/cibconfig.py
>>
>> However, the ordered,colocated attribute of the group resource is treated as an error when I use crm Shell which adopted this patch.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> (snip)
>> ### Group Configuration ###
>> group master-group \
>>         vip-master \
>>         vip-rep \
>>         meta \
>>                 ordered="false"
>> (snip)
>>
>> [root at rh63-heartbeat1 ~]# crm configure load update test2339.crm 
>> INFO: building help index
>> crm_verify[20028]: 2013/03/06_17:57:18 WARN: unpack_nodes: Blind faith: not fencing unseen nodes
>> WARNING: vip-master: specified timeout 60s for start is smaller than the advised 90
>> WARNING: vip-master: specified timeout 60s for stop is smaller than the advised 100
>> WARNING: vip-rep: specified timeout 60s for start is smaller than the advised 90
>> WARNING: vip-rep: specified timeout 60s for stop is smaller than the advised 100
>> ERROR: master-group: attribute ordered does not exist  -----> WHY?
>> Do you still want to commit? y
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> If it chooses `yes` by a confirmation message, it is reflected, but it is a problem that error message is displayed.
>>  * The error occurs in the same way when I appoint colocated attribute.
>> And....I noticed that there was not explanation of ordered,colocated of the group resource in online help of Pacemaker.
>>
>> I think that the designation of the ordered,colocated attribute should not become the error in group resource.
>> In addition, I think that ordered,colocated should be added to online help.
> 
> These attributes are not listed in crmsh. Does the attached patch
> help?

Dejan, will this patch for the missing "ordered" and "collocated" group
meta-attribute be included in the next crmsh release? ... can't see the
patch in the current tip.

Thanks & Regards,
Andreas

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dejan
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Hideo Yamauchi.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 287 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130401/a26c6efb/attachment-0002.sig>