[Pacemaker] [Question] About the stop order at the time of the Probe error.

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Sep 4 23:28:08 UTC 2012


On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comments.
>
>> > Question 1) Is there right setting in cib.xml to evade this problem?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> >
>> > Question 2) In Pacemaker1.1, does this problem occur?
>>
>> Yes.  I'll see what I can do.
>>
>> >
>> > Question 3) I added following order.
>> >
>> >
>> >         <rsc_order id="order-2" first="resource1" then="resource3" />
>> >         <rsc_order id="order-3" first="resource1" then="resource4" />
>> >         <rsc_order id="order-5" first="resource2" then="resource4" />
>> >
>> >             And the addition of this order seems to solve a problem.
>> >             Is the addition of order right as one method of the solution, too?
>>
>> Really the PE should handle this implicitly, without need for
>> additional constraints.
>
> All right.
>
> I wish this problem is solved.
> I registered a demand with Bugzilla about this problem.
>  * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5101

Great. Thankyou :)




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list