[Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now

[Andrew Beekhof]

Urgh, I tried but getting libqb to build on RHEL-5 isn't trivial.
If someone can make an srpm that gets past that step, I will build the rest.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:49 AM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
<mohamed.s at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Thanks Andrew :)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 4:03 PM
>> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:28 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
>> <mohamed.s at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is it possible to get/build pacemaker 1.1.8 rpms for RHEL5?
>>
>> I think you'd be pushing it.
>> glib (and I think some other packages) on RHEL5 are really ancient and
>> would need to be updated before pacemaker will build.
>> if i get time in the next week I will have a go.
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Raffi
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:andrew at beekhof.net]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 3:41 PM
>> >> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.1.8 is out now
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
>> >> <bubble at hoster-ok.com> wrote:
>> >> > 20.09.2012 13:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> >> This has been coming for a while now, the final hold-up was some
>> >> >> stonith interactions in the presence of multiple clients that while
>> >> >> strictly correct, wasn't really good enough.
>> >> >
>> >> > 1.1.8 seems to be in a very good shape. Didn't you think about making
>> it
>> >> > a mid-term stable release?
>> >>
>> >> No, there are a couple of minor features to go before 1.2/2.0
>> >> (whatever we call it) in about a month and that is what will be the
>> >> long-term stable release.
>> >>
>> >> > That would be really great to receive bug
>> >> > fixes ported to 1.1.8 code base without master's new features which
>> you
>> >> > know sometimes "break everything".
>> >>
>> >> There aren't any features like this planned until after 1.2/2.0 is
>> >> branched.
>> >> We're basically just doing the last bit of polish before the stable
>> >> series.
>> >>
>> >> I would be stunned if the next release went backwards.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you for a great work!
>> >>
>> >> Glad to hear we're making someone happy :)
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >>
>> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> >> Getting started:
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> >> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org