[Pacemaker] setting up NFS resources on systemd based Linux distributions

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Lonni J Friedman <netllama at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:24 AM, David Vossel <dvossel at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lonni J Friedman" <netllama at gmail.com>
>>>> To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:44:21 PM
>>>> Subject: [Pacemaker] setting up NFS resources on systemd based Linux  distributions
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to setup NFS resources on Fedora16, and its not working.
>>>> After googling, I stumbled across the following discussion from about
>>>> 8 months ago:
>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/77404
>>>>
>>>> Has anything changed since then, or is systemd still not supported?
>>>
>>> Yes, systemd is now supported in the latest 1.1.8 release that came out a few days ago.  Use 'systemd' or 'service' as the resource class when defining the resource in the configuration and everything should just work.
>>
>> I finally got around to upgrading to pacemaker-1.1.8-2.fc16.x86_64
>> using a rebuilt
>> http://clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/fedora-17/src/pacemaker-1.1.8-2.fc17.src.rpm
>> .
>>
>> Unfortunately, this resource class is either not working, or I'm
>> misunderstanding how it needs to be specified.  I tried adding the
>> following:
>> primitive FS0_NFS systemd:nfs-server.service op monitor interval="10s"
>
> just "systemd:nfs-server" no ".service" suffix.

Oh, you tried that.  Weird.  Logs?

What does crm_resource --list-standards say?

>>
>> But when I try to save the change to the configuration, I get the
>> following errors:
>> ERROR: systemd:nfs-server.service: could not parse meta-data:
>> ERROR: systemd:nfs-server.service: could not parse meta-data:
>> ERROR: systemd:nfs-server.service: no such resource agent
>>
>> I also tried using service:nfs-server and systemd:nfs-server, but
>> those failed in a similar fashion.  What am I missing?
>>
>> thanks