[Pacemaker] [corosync] Corosync 2.1.0 dies on both nodes in cluster
Jan Friesse
jfriesse at redhat.com
Thu Nov 1 12:55:52 UTC 2012
Ansdrew,
I was not able to find anything interesting (from corosync point of
view) in configuration/logs (corosync related).
What would be helpful:
- if corosync died, there should be
/var/lib/corosync/fdata-DATETTIME-PID of dead corosync. Can you please
xz them and store somewhere (they are quiet large but well compressible).
- If you are able to reproduce problem (what seems like you are), can
you please allow generating of coredumps and store somewhere backtrace
of coredump? (coredumps are stored in /var/lib/corosync as core.PID, and
way to obtain coredump is gdb corosync /var/lib/corosync/core.pid, and
here thread apply all bt). If you are running distribution with ABRT
support, you can also use ABRT to generate report.
Regards,
Honza
Andrew Martin napsal(a):
> Corosync died an additional 3 times during the night on storage1. I wrote a daemon to attempt and start it as soon as it fails, so only one of those times resulted in a STONITH of storage1.
>
> I enabled debug in the corosync config, so I was able to capture a period when corosync died with debug output:
> http://pastebin.com/eAmJSmsQ
> In this example, Pacemaker finishes shutting down by Nov 01 05:53:02. For reference, here is my Pacemaker configuration:
> http://pastebin.com/DFL3hNvz
>
> It seems that an extra node, 16777343 "localhost" has been added to the cluster after storage1 was STONTIHed (must be the localhost interface on storage1). Is there anyway to prevent this?
>
> Does this help to determine why corosync is dying, and what I can do to fix it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Andrew Martin" <amartin at xes-inc.com>
> To: discuss at corosync.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 1, 2012 12:11:35 AM
> Subject: [corosync] Corosync 2.1.0 dies on both nodes in cluster
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently configured a 3-node fileserver cluster by building Corosync 2.1.0 and Pacemaker 1.1.8 from source. All of the nodes are running Ubuntu 12.04 amd64. Two of the nodes (storage0 and storage1) are "real" nodes where the resources run (a DRBD disk, filesystem mount, and samba/nfs daemons), while the third node (storagequorum) is in standby mode and acts as a quorum node for the cluster. Today I discovered that corosync died on both storage0 and storage1 at the same time. Since corosync died, pacemaker shut down as well on both nodes. Because the cluster no longer had quorum (and the no-quorum-policy="freeze"), storagequorum was unable to STONITH either node and just left the resources frozen where they were running, on storage0. I cannot find any log information to determine why corosync crashed, and this is a disturbing problem as the cluster and its messaging layer must be stable. Below is my corosync configuration file as well as the corosync log file from each no!
de during
this period.
>
> corosync.conf:
> http://pastebin.com/vWQDVmg8
> Note that I have two redundant rings. On one of them, I specify the IP address (in this example 10.10.10.7) so that it binds to the correct interface (since potentially in the future those machines may have two interfaces on the same subnet).
>
> corosync.log from storage0:
> http://pastebin.com/HK8KYDDQ
>
> corosync.log from storage1:
> http://pastebin.com/sDWkcPUz
>
> corosync.log from storagequorum (the DC during this period):
> http://pastebin.com/uENQ5fnf
>
> Issuing service corosync start && service pacemaker start on storage0 and storage1 resolved the problem and allowed the nodes to successfully reconnect to the cluster. What other information can I provide to help diagnose this problem and prevent it from recurring?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at corosync.org
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at corosync.org
> http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list