[Pacemaker] unbound resource agent

[Arnold Krille]

On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:52:21 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:48:11PM +0100, Benjamin Kiessling wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2012.03.14 14:24:10 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > > dnsCache_start_0 (node=router1, call=56, rc=-2, status=Timed Out):
> > > > unknown exec error dnsCache_monitor_1000 (node=router2, call=24,
> > > > rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
> This one exited with a generic error. Didn't notice that. The RA
> should've logged the reason.
> > > > dnsCache_start_0 (node=router2, call=81, rc=-2, status=Timed Out):
> > > > unknown exec error> > 
> > > These operations timed out, i.e. didn't finish in the given time
> > > frame which is by default 20 seconds.
> > 
> > It says the return code is -2 which isn't a return code specified in the
> > OCF standard. unbound usually starts fast and I can't see anything in
> > the logs indicating an error during initialization.
> 
> Negative exit codes are special and cannot be produced by a
> script.

Negative exit-codes are "special" in that they commonly denote an error while 
positive exit-codes might be regular results of the app/script running.
And there is no difference between a script and a "real" program when it comes 
to returning exit-codes.

You might mean that either the RA-script or the cluster-software itself can't 
return negative exit-codes...

> Hmm, I've always thought that "Timed Out" in that
> message above is unequivocal.

"Timed out" is one of the errors. And when you have some positive exit-codes 
for "the script went well but the state of the resource is <bla>", its 
perfectly okay to use negative exit-codes to signal things like "the RA script 
didn't execute" or "the RA script took to long to execute"...

Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20120314/95c61137/attachment-0004.sig>