[Pacemaker] Migration atomicity

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2012-03-14T23:49:26, Andreas Kurz <andreas at hastexo.com> wrote:

> > Is the current behavior intended?
> You mean that a migration is rolled-back due to a transition abort --
> depending on its progress? I think that is the defined (and intended)
> behavior since quite a long time ... maybe Andrew likes to comment on that?

I *think* in-flight transitions should finish as started.

If this is repeatable, one may need a bug filed.



Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde