[Pacemaker] Time-based resource stickiness not working cleanly
Jake Smith
jsmith at argotec.com
Wed Jun 27 20:42:57 UTC 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Prakash Velayutham" <Prakash.Velayutham at cchmc.org>
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:06:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Time-based resource stickiness not working cleanly
>
> I created a simple IPaddr2 resource for this testing.
>
> 1. I can confirm that this resource (with just a location preference
> constraint and nothing else) does not get restarted when a node
> reboots. So must be something with the clone/group resources. Not
> sure how to debug right now.
Not sure but maybe something to do with interleave/ordered in the clone definition?
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch10s02s02.html
You should try what Phil said and create a dummy primitive and clone that then test and see if the cloned dummy exhibits the same issues as the problem ones.
> 2. I have a time-based rule which prevents any resource in the
> cluster from going back to the preferred node between 7am and 3pm,
> monday through friday.
> I can confirm that in my setting this does not work reliably.
> The resource fails over to the non-preferred node, but stays there
> even if the current time is outside of the core business hours.
> If I manually stop and start the resource, then it respects the
> location preference and goes to the preferred node.
> I have the cluster-recheck-interval set to 1min.
I didn't see/look at your config but that sounds like a score problem between stickiness/clone score/rule value.
HTH
Jake
>
> Thanks,
> Prakash
>
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote:
>
> > I am all for testing, but looks like our database person wants this
> > completed now. I will test this in our dev. environment soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prakash
> >
> > On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Phil Frost wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/27/2012 02:33 PM, Velayutham, Prakash wrote:
> >>> and the cluster works fine, except that when the fenced
> >>> (STONITHed) node comes back up and joins the cluster, all
> >>> resources (including the one that is running in its preferred
> >>> location) gets restarted.
> >>>
> >>> This is annoying and I am trying to find out why this is. I
> >>> started another thread for that exact issue this morning and I
> >>> have shared the relevant portions of my CIB there. Please let me
> >>> know if you see anything there that could cause this.
> >>
> >> Your best approach is probably to simplify the configuration as
> >> much as you can. Eliminate any resources or constraints that
> >> aren't necessary to demonstrate the problem, and use
> >> ocf:pacemaker:Dummy and ocf:pacemaker:Stateful resources instead
> >> of the real ones. In simplifying the configuration, you may
> >> discover a mistake. If not, you will have something that doesn't
> >> take so much time to consider, so more people will be willing to
> >> help you.
> >>
> >> Also, play with crm_simulate.
> >>
> >> Also see my previous response about a similar problem I had, and a
> >> suspected bug that may be affecting you. If you can independently
> >> confirm the bug, after working out a minimal test case as above,
> >> it's more likely someone will fix it.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> >
> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> > Getting started:
> > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started:
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list