[Pacemaker] Do you need to execute crm_ticket on arbitrator?

[Jiaju Zhang]

On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 13:10 +0900, Yuichi SEINO wrote:
> > Yes, arbitrator is not using cib. I'm fine with removing the crm_ticket
> > calling logic on arbitrator. An implementation detail on this issue
> > would be to keep the modularity of the code structure, that is,
> > proposer, acceptor and learner is the terminology of paxos algorithm,
> > site and arbitrator is the GEO clustering terminology, I'd like each
> > component to be more independent and its internal logic is transparent
> > to other components.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jiaju
> >
> >
> 
> Hi jiaju,
> 
> I understand the answer. Do you fix this problem on the next development?

Yes.

> 
> And, I know that the following function will be developed when you
> work the next development.
> 
> * new catch-up code
> * the refactoring of the transport layer
> 
> I would like to know if there are other functions.

To add more policies and make booth more configurable, add watchdog
daemon.

Also you can raise your feature request if you think something need to
be implemented;)

Thanks,
Jiaju