[Pacemaker] Behavior booth when the temporary ACT site down happened.
Yuichi SEINO
seino.cluster2 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 12 10:02:27 UTC 2012
Hi Jiaju,
I understand the answer. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Yuichi
>
> Oh, if you have powered off all the nodes in Site A, it can explain why
> there is no the information on CIB in bug#5082 ;)
>
> Site A can join the booth cluster, given that the catch-up has been
> finished. Since Site A was recovered within the expire date, so no other
> site try to acquire the ticket for the time being, so Site A may get the
> ticket via the voting again.
>
> I understand your question, if Site A can still keep the original ticket
> but not go into the next round voting, that would be much better than
> current behavior. It needs site A to analyze all the information that
> just caught up, to determine if that ticket really belongs to himself or
> not. This feature is in my todo list, I'm planning to refactor the
> catch-up code, together with some refactoring of the transport layer in
> the next development.
>
> Thanks,
> Jiaju
>
--
Yuichi SEINO
METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION
E-mail:seino.cluster2 at gmail.com
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list