[Pacemaker] [Problem] The attrd does not sometimes stop.
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Jan 16 23:37:18 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Lars Ellenberg
<lars.ellenberg at linbit.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:42:32PM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >>> http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.30/glib-The-Main-Event-Loop.html#GSourceFuncs
>> >>>
>> >>> iiuc, mainloop does something similar to (oversimplified):
>> >>> timeout = -1; /* infinity */
>> >>> for s in all GSource
>> >>> tmp_timeout = -1;
>> >>> s->prepare(s, &tmp_timeout)
>> >>> if (tmp_timeout >= 0 && tmp_timeout < timeout)
>> >>> timeout = tmp_timeout;
>> >>>
>> >>> poll(GSource fd set, n, timeout);
>> >>
>> >> I'm looking at the glib code again now, and it still looks to me like
>> >> the trigger and signal sources do not appear in this fd set.
>> >> Their setup functions would have to have called g_source_add_poll()
>> >> somewhere, which they don't.
>> >>
>> >> So I'm still not seeing why its a trigger or signal sources' fault
>> >> that glib is doing a never ending call to poll().
>> >> poll() is going to get called regardless of whether our prepare
>> >> function returns true or not.
>> >>
>> >> Looking closer, crm_trigger_prepare() returning TRUE results in:
>> >> ready_source->flags |= G_SOURCE_READY;
>> >>
>> >> which in turn causes:
>> >> context->timeout = 0;
>> >>
>> >> which is essentially what adding
>> >> if (trig->trigger)
>> >> *timeout = 0;
>> >>
>> >> to crm_trigger_prepare() was intended to achieve.
>> >>
>> >> Shouldn't the fd, ipc or wait sources (who do call g_source_add_poll()
>> >> and could therefor cause poll() to block forever) have a sane timeout
>> >> in their prepare functions?
>
> Probably should, but they usually have not.
> The reasoning probably is, each GSource is responsible for *itself* only.
Well no, because this forces trigger to care about whether there is a
fd based GSource too and what timeout, if any, is set.
>
> That is why first all sources are prepared.
>
> If no non-fd, non-pollable source feels the need to reduce the
> *timeout to something finite in its prepare(), so be it.
So something that doesn't use poll at all should set a timeout for
poll, that doesn't sound right :-)
>
> Besides, what is sane? 1 second? 5? 120? 240?
>
> That's why G_CH_prepare_int() sets the *timeout to 1000,
> and why I suggest to set it to 0 if prepare already knows that the
> trigger is set, and to some finite amount to avoid getting stuck in
> poll, in case no timeout or outher source source is active which also
> set some finite timeout.
>
> BTW, if you have an *idle* sources, prepare should set timeout to 0.
>
> For those interested, all described below
> http://developer.gnome.org/glib/2.30/glib-The-Main-Event-Loop.html#GSourceFuncs
>
> "For idle sources, the prepare and check functions always return TRUE to
> indicate that the source is always ready to be processed. The prepare
> function also returns a timeout value of 0 to ensure that the poll()
> call doesn't block (since that would be time wasted which could have
> been spent running the idle function)."
>
> "... timeout sources ... returns a timeout value to ensure that the
> poll() call doesn't block too long ..."
>
> "... file descriptor sources ... timeout to -1 to indicate that is does
> not mind how long the poll() call blocks ... "
>
>> >> Or is it because the signal itself is interrupting some essential part
>> >> of G_CH_prepare_int() and friends?
>
> In the provided strace, it looks like the SIGTERM
> is delivered while calling some G_CH_prepare_int,
> the ->prepare() used by G_main_add_IPC_Channel.
>
> Since the signal sources are of higher priority,
> we probably are passt those already in this iteration,
> we will only notice the trigger in the next check(),
> after the poll.
>
> So it is vital for any non-pollable source such as signals
> to set a finite timeout in their prepare(),
> even if we also mark that signal siginterrupt().
>
>> >>> for s in all GSource
>> >>> if s->check(s)
>> >>> s->dispatch(s, ...)
>> >>>
>> >>> And at some stage it also orders by priority, of course.
>> >>>
>> >>> Also compare with the comment above /* Sigh... */ in glue G_SIG_prepare().
>> >>>
>> >>> BTW, the mentioned race between signal delivery and mainloop already
>> >>> doing the poll stage could potentially be solved by using
>> >>> cl_signal_set_interrupt(SIGTERM, 1),
>
> As I just wrote above, that race is not solved at all.
> Only the (necessarily set) finite timeout of the poll
> would be shortened in that case.
>
>> >> But I can't escape the feeling that calling this just masks the
>> >> underlying "why is there a never-ending call to poll() in the first
>> >> place" issue.
>> >> G_CH_prepare_int() and friends /should/ be setting timeouts so that
>> >> poll() can return and any sources created by g_idle_source_new() can
>> >> execute.
>> >
>> > Actually, thinking further, I'm pretty convinced that poll() with an
>> > infinite timeout is the default mode of operation for mainloops with
>> > cluster-glue's IPC and FD sources.
>> > And that this is not a good thing :)
>
> Well, if there are *only* pollable sources, it is.
> If there are any other sources, they should have set
> their limit on what they think is an acceptable timeout
> int their prepare().
>
>> Far too late, brain shutting down.
>
> ;-)
>
>> ...not a good thing, because it breaks the idle stuff,
>
> see above, explanation on developer.gnome.org,
> idle stuff is expected to set timeout 0 (or "just a few ms").
>
>> but most of all because it requires /all/ external events to come out
>> of that poll() call.
>
> If you have any non-pollable event sources,
> they need to set a finite timeout in their prepare().
>
>> >>> which would mean we can condense the prepare to
>
> Nope, I have already corrected myself, not sufficient.
>
> And, actually, if the prepare() returns true,
> it will be dispatched() right there, anyways, I think,
> which makes the conditional *timeout = 0 useless.
>
> So what G_SIG_prepare() does it just the right thing:
> unconditionally set *timeout = 1000 for a maximum
> signal callback dispatch delay of one second.
>
> (plus whatever time it takes to call all the other prepare
> functions, plut whatever time it takes to return from the
> dispatch functions... so better not spend too much time there,
> that's why my first suspicion in this thread was those blocking
> IPC calls in some dispatch callbacks)
>
> Lars
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list