[Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb at suse.com> wrote:
> On 2012-12-06T20:10:42, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> > To be honest, *I* couldn't figure out what "failure-delegate" would mean
>> > here. "So, the child delegates its failures to the parent as part of the
>> > child being ordered after the parent? Uh? How's that making sense?"
>> > ;-)
>> No, its a resource (meta) attribute, not a constraint option.
>> Any failures get delegated to the named resource.
>>
>> Am am at least heartened that Yan knew what I was talking about :)
>
> ;-) Still, the normal (to me, at least) thinking would be "OK, so the VM
> is the container.  And then a rsc running/being monitored within the
> container *delegates* its failure upwards?"

The direction is irrelevant. You're can delegate it anywhere you like,
but in this case it would be to the vm.

> It does confuse me.
>
> And, where you've lost me for a bit - are you know speaking up against
> an attribute on the order constraint, or are you proposing something in
> addition?

I'm saying if you have this you don't need an attribute on the
ordering constraint.

>
>
> Regards,
>     Lars
>
> --
> Architect Storage/HA
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org