[Pacemaker] Multi-state slave resource promoted when node was not quorate, expected?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Dec 17 20:19:51 EST 2012


On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Jesse Hathaway
<jesse.hathaway at getbraintree.com> wrote:
> We had a switch failure and all the nodes were partitioned. The slave node
> promoted its resource while it did not have quorum. We have no-quourm-policy
> set to freeze. Is it expected for resource promotion to occur when a node
> does not have quorum?

No. That sounds like a bug.  Can you attach a crm_report tarball to a
bugzilla entry please?




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list