[Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring

Gao,Yan ygao at suse.com
Wed Dec 12 02:38:27 EST 2012


On 12/12/12 11:14, Gao,Yan wrote:
> On 12/12/12 01:53, David Vossel wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Yan Gao" <ygao at suse.com>
>>> To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:23:03 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Here's the latest code:
>>> https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker/commit/4d58026c2171c42385c85162a0656c44b37fa7e8
>>>
>>>
>>> Now:
>>> - container-type:
>>>   * black - ordering, colocating
>>>   * white - ordering
>>>   Both them are not probed so far.
>>
>> I think for the sake of this implementation we should ignore the whitebox use case for now.  There are aspects of the whitebox use case that I'm just not sure about yet, and I don't want to hold you all up trying to define that. I don't mind re-approaching this container concept and expanding it to the whitebox use case later on building with what you have here.  I'm in favor of removing the "container-type" letting the blackbox use case be the default for now, and I'll go in and do our whitebox bits later. 
> Hmm, this might be better before we have a clear definition for whitebox.
Removed "container-type" for now. Pushed with several regression tests:

Regards,
  Gao,Yan
-- 
Gao,Yan <ygao at suse.com>
Software Engineer
China Server Team, SUSE.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list