[Pacemaker] Enable remote monitoring

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

On 2012-12-07T10:38:44, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> > Uhm. Would "container" imply ordering + colocation, or would we still
> > need them grouped (resource_set'ed, whatever)?
> Ordering: absolutely
> Colocation is less clear, I think the default is no but David has suggested an additional meta attribute to turn it on.

blackbox - colocated on the node where the container is running
           - not probed
whitebox - colocated on the virtual node provided by the container
           - probed only there

? Obviously, so far, we'd only implemented the first kind, since we
don't yet have the second, but it would go there.

> > My, design is hard. ;-)
> I like where we got to in the end though, it should handle both white
> and black box monitoring nicely.  Being a PITA can have its benefits.

True. So is being persistent ;-)


Regards,
    Lars

-- 
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde