[Pacemaker] [Problem] Order which combined a master with clone is invalid.

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Aug 7 11:27:21 UTC 2012 

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 2:08 PM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you or commets.
>
>> > Online: [ drbd1 drbd2 ]
>> >
>> >  Master/Slave Set: msDrPostgreSQLDB
>> >      Masters: [ drbd2 ]
>> >      Slaves: [ drbd1 ] -------------------------------> Started and Status Slave.
>>
>> Yep, looks like a bug.  I'll follow up on the bugzilla.
>
> I talked with David by Bugzilla.
>
> And I confirmed that I worked by two next methods well.
>
> The first method)
>  * Set colocation in clnPingd and msDrPostgreSQLDB.
>
> The second method)
>  * Set interleave option in clnPingd.
>
> Do my two methods include a mistake?

No.

Looking closer, the initial constraint says only that the Master must
be on a node running clnPingd.
Slaves are free to run anywhere :)

>
> If you suspect the bug, please write in comment at Bugzilla.
>
> Many Thanks,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> --- On Mon, 2012/7/30, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>> > Hi David,
>> >
>> > Thank you for comments.
>> >
>> >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch06s03s02.html
>> >
>> > I confirmed it in INFINITY.
>> >
>> > (snip)
>> >       <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation-1" rsc="msDrPostgreSQLDB" rsc-role="Master" score="INFINITY" with-rsc="clnPingd"/>
>> >       <rsc_order first="clnPingd" id="rsc_order-1" score="INFINITY" symmetrical="false" then="msDrPostgreSQLDB"/>
>> > (snip)
>> >
>> >
>> > By the start only for Master nodes, it was controlled well.
>> >
>> > [root at drbd1 ~]# crm_mon -1 -f
>> > ============
>> > Last updated: Mon Jul 23 08:24:38 2012
>> > Stack: Heartbeat
>> > Current DC: NONE
>> > 1 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
>> > 2 Resources configured.
>> > ============
>> >
>> > Online: [ drbd1 ]
>> >
>> >
>> > Migration summary:
>> > * Node drbd1:
>> >    prmPingd:0: migration-threshold=1 fail-count=1000000
>> >
>> > Failed actions:
>> >     prmPingd:0_start_0 (node=drbd1, call=4, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
>> >
>> >
>> > However, the problem occurs when I send cib after the Slave node started together.
>> >
>> > ============
>> > Last updated: Mon Jul 23 08:35:41 2012
>> > Stack: Heartbeat
>> > Current DC: drbd2 (6d4b04de-12c0-499a-b388-febba50eaec2) - partition with quorum
>> > Version: 1.0.12-unknown
>> > 2 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
>> > 2 Resources configured.
>> > ============
>> >
>> > Online: [ drbd1 drbd2 ]
>> >
>> >  Master/Slave Set: msDrPostgreSQLDB
>> >      Masters: [ drbd2 ]
>> >      Slaves: [ drbd1 ] -------------------------------> Started and Status Slave.
>>
>> Yep, looks like a bug.  I'll follow up on the bugzilla.
>>
>> >  Clone Set: clnPingd
>> >      Started: [ drbd2 ]
>> >      Stopped: [ prmPingd:0 ]
>> >
>> > Migration summary:
>> > * Node drbd1:
>> >    prmPingd:0: migration-threshold=1 fail-count=1000000
>> > * Node drbd2:
>> >
>> > Failed actions:
>> >     prmPingd:0_start_0 (node=drbd1, call=4, rc=1, status=complete): unknown error
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Sat, 2012/7/21, David Vossel <dvossel at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> > From: renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp
>> >> > To: "PaceMaker-ML" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
>> >> > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:39:51 AM
>> >> > Subject: [Pacemaker] [Problem] Order which combined a master with clone is    invalid.
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> >
>> >> > We confirmed movement of order which combined a master with clone.
>> >> > We performed it by a very simple combination.
>> >> >
>> >> > Step1) We change it to produce start error in Dummy resource.
>> >> >
>> >> > (snip)
>> >> > dummy_start() {
>> >> > return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC
>> >> >     dummy_monitor
>> >> > (snip)
>> >> >
>> >> > Step2) We start one node and send cib.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > However, as for the master, it is done start even if start of clone
>> >> > fails.
>> >> > And it becomes the Slave state.
>> >>
>> >> Not a bug,  You are using advisory ordering in your order constraint.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch06s03s02.html
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > ============
>> >> > Last updated: Fri Jul 20 15:36:10 2012
>> >> > Stack: Heartbeat
>> >> > Current DC: NONE
>> >> > 1 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
>> >> > 2 Resources configured.
>> >> > ============
>> >> >
>> >> > Online: [ drbd1 ]
>> >> >
>> >> >  Master/Slave Set: msDrPostgreSQLDB
>> >> >      Slaves: [ drbd1 ]
>> >> >      Stopped: [ prmDrPostgreSQLDB:1 ]
>> >> >
>> >> > Migration summary:
>> >> > * Node drbd1:
>> >> >    prmPingd:0: migration-threshold=1 fail-count=1000000
>> >> >
>> >> > Failed actions:
>> >> >     prmPingd:0_start_0 (node=drbd1, call=4, rc=1, status=complete):
>> >> >     unknown error
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > We confirmed it just to make sure in Pacemaker1.1.7.
>> >> > However, the problem was the same.
>> >> >
>> >> > ============
>> >> > Last updated: Fri Jul 20 22:53:22 2012
>> >> > Last change: Fri Jul 20 22:53:09 2012 via cibadmin on fedora17-1
>> >> > Stack: corosync
>> >> > Current DC: fedora17-1 (1) - partition with quorum
>> >> > Version: 1.1.7-e6922a70f742d3eab63d7e22f3ea0408b54b5dae
>> >> > 1 Nodes configured, unknown expected votes
>> >> > 4 Resources configured.
>> >> > ============
>> >> >
>> >> > Online: [ fedora17-1 ]
>> >> >
>> >> >  Master/Slave Set: msDrPostgreSQLDB [prmDrPostgreSQLDB]
>> >> >      Slaves: [ fedora17-1 ]
>> >> >      Stopped: [ prmDrPostgreSQLDB:1 ]
>> >> >
>> >> > Migration summary:
>> >> > * Node fedora17-1:
>> >> >    prmPingd:0: migration-threshold=1 fail-count=1000000
>> >> >
>> >> > Failed actions:
>> >> >     prmPingd:0_start_0 (node=fedora17-1, call=14, rc=1,
>> >> >     status=complete): unknown error
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I think that this problem is similar to the bug that I reported
>> >> > before.
>> >> >
>> >> >  * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5075.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is this problem a bug?
>> >> > Or can we be improved by setting?
>> >>
>> >> see advisory ordering
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Best Regards,
>> >> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >> >
>> >> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> >> > Getting started:
>> >> > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> >> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list