[Pacemaker] Quick question regarding wiki vs 'Clusters from Scratch v2'
mark - pacemaker list
m+pacemaker at nerdish.us
Wed Aug 1 23:20:40 UTC 2012
Good afternoon,
Looking at the corosync configuration examples on the wiki (
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Initial_Configuration ) and in the Clusters
from Scratch document (
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/_sample_corosync_configuration.html),
there are a number of changes or omissions of settings.
The wiki example includes:
token: 5000
token_retransmits_before_loss_const: 20
join: 1000
consensus: 7500
vsftype: none
max_messages: 20
clear_nod_high_bit: yes
... and a few other settings that are no longer in the CfSv2 document. The
corosync.conf example there is very close to the default configuration when
building from source. It no longer covers creating a service definition in
/etc/corosync/services.d/, because that's no longer needed and instead
corosync and pacemaker are started individually. What about the other
settings, though? I noticed with the CfSv2 sample config only (altered for
my network), I get negative node ids since it doesn't include the
'clear_node_high_bit' setting. Does that have no negative repercussions
with pacemaker? Are any of those other more conservative timing settings
still relevant, or is it pretty safe to just tweak the example
configuration and let corosync and pacemaker do their thing with largely
default values?
Thanks,
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20120801/50108e05/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list