[Pacemaker] OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_{ordered,notify,interleave}

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Florian Haas <florian at hastexo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>> Well, but you did read the technical reason I presented here?
>>
>> Yes, and it boiled down to "don't let the user hang themselves".
>> Which is a noble goal, I just don't like the way we're achieving it.
>>
>> Why not advertise the requirements in the metadata somehow?
>
> The only way to do that is in the longdesc. There is nothing in the
> schema that would allow us to do this in a machine-readable way so the
> shell, HAWK, LCMC or anything else could warn the user by themselves.

The schema is not immutable though.  We've already added fields to it,
why not for this too?

>
>>> Why are we not supposed to check for things like notify, ordered, allow-migrate?
>>>
>>>> My concern with providing them all to RAs is that someone will
>>>> probably start abusing them.
>>>
>>> _Everything_ about an RA can be abused. Why is that any concern of
>>> yours? You can't possibly enforce, from Pacemaker, that an RA actually
>>> does what it's supposed to do.
>>
>> No, but I can take away the extra ammo :)
>
> You can count on there always being one round in the gun pointed at your foot.
>
> Florian
>
> --
> Need help with High Availability?
> http://www.hastexo.com/now
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org