[Pacemaker] Periodically appear non-existent nodes
David Vossel
dvossel at redhat.com
Thu Apr 19 17:58:09 CEST 2012
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vladislav Bogdanov" <bubble at hoster-ok.com>
> To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:06:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Periodically appear non-existent nodes
>
> 19.04.2012 11:24, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> > On 04/18/2012 11:46 PM, ruslan usifov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/4/18 Andreas Kurz <andreas at hastexo.com
> >> <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com>>
> >>
> >> On 04/17/2012 09:31 PM, ruslan usifov wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2012/4/17 Proskurin Kirill <k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru
> >> <mailto:k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru>
> >> > <mailto:k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru
> >> > <mailto:k.proskurin at corp.mail.ru>>>
> >> >
> >> > On 04/17/2012 03:46 PM, ruslan usifov wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 2012/4/17 Andreas Kurz <andreas at hastexo.com
> >> <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com>
> >> > <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com
> >> > <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com>>
> >> <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com>
> >> > <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com
> >> > <mailto:andreas at hastexo.com>>>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 04/14/2012 11:14 PM, ruslan usifov wrote:
> >> > > Hello
> >> > >
> >> > > I remove 2 nodes from cluster, with follow
> >> > > sequence:
> >> > >
> >> > > crm_node --force -R <id of node1>
> >> > > crm_node --force -R <id of node2>
> >> > > cibadmin --delete --obj_type nodes --crm_xml
> >> > > '<node
> >> > uname="node1"/>'
> >> > > cibadmin --delete --obj_type status --crm_xml
> >> '<node_state
> >> > uname="node1"/>'
> >> > > cibadmin --delete --obj_type nodes --crm_xml
> >> > > '<node
> >> > uname="node2"/>'
> >> > > cibadmin --delete --obj_type status --crm_xml
> >> '<node_state
> >> > uname="node2"/>'
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Nodes after this deleted, but if for example i
> >> > > restart
> >> > (reboot)
> >> > one of
> >> > > existent nodes in working cluster, this
> >> > > deleted nodes
> >> > appear again in
> >> > > OFFLINE state
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I have this problem some time ago.
> >> > I "solved" it something like that:
> >> >
> >> > crm node delete NODENAME
> >> > crm_node --force --remove NODENAME
> >> > cibadmin --delete --obj_type nodes --crm_xml '<node
> >> uname="NODENAME"/>'
> >> > cibadmin --delete --obj_type status --crm_xml
> >> > '<node_state
> >> > uname="NODENAME"/>'
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I do the same, but some times after cluster reconfiguration
> >> > (node
> >> failed
> >> > due power supply failure) removed nodes appear again, and
> >> > this happens
> >> > 3-4 times
> >>
> >> And the same behavior if you switch your cluster into
> >> maintenance-mode
> >> (to avoid service downtime) and stop/start pacemaker and
> >> corosync
> >> completely?
> >>
> >>
> >> We will have maintenance window at this Friday (20.04.2012) so
> >> after
> >> that i can report more info.
> >
> > Of course, that is the safest option ... though you won't have a
> > service
> > downtime if you enable maintenance-mode prior to cluster restart.
>
> Unless you are using DLM (CLVM, GFS2, OCFS2). Then you should not
> stop
> corosync - dlm_controld uses CPG.
>
> And, DLM may use pacemaker parts for fencing (cib, attrd, stonith,
> depending on version).
>
> >
> >>
> >> PS: I had similar situation on other cluster some times ago, and
> >> there i
> >> fully restart cluster and problem reproduced. But after some
> >> time(about
> >> 1-2 week) not existent nodes have ceased to appear
> >
> > Now that is really strange ... if that happens again, the
> > corosync/pacemaker log files would be really interesting to have a
> > look at.
>
> I recall that is a known issue for a rather long time.
> One need to do a full (not rolling) restart to make node fully
> disappear.
> I checked this again not so long ago, and yes, node deletion does not
> work with current master branch (or very close to it) - it appears
> again
> after pacemaker restart on any other node.
>
> May be it is because of lrmd cache, like with failed actions? It
> looks
> very similar to that.
Looks similar, but it shouldn't be related.
-- Vossel
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list