[Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective

[David Vossel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 7:24:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective
> 
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:19 AM, David Vossel <dvossel at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" <inouekazu at intellilink.co.jp>
> >> To: "pacemaker at oss" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> >> Cc: koichi at intellilink.co.jp
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:08:44 PM
> >> Subject: [Pacemaker]  on-fail is not effective
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am using Pacemaker-1.1 (devel:
> >> 7172b7323bb72c51999ce11c6fa5d3ff0a0a4b4f).
> >> The setting of "on-fail" does not become effective.
> >> For example, it becomes default action("restart") even if it
> >> specifies "stop".
> >
> > The resource is stopping, but if there is nothing to prevent the
> > resource from starting again
> 
> The failed op itself and the preference is supposed to be sufficient.
> 
> > it will start after the stop action has completed. This is probably
> > why 'restart' and 'stop' appear to have the same behavior.
> 
> That sounds like a bug and not the intended behaviour.

I created a bug report for this, http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5058. I'll investigate it.

-- Vossel