[Pacemaker] minimizing cluster-glue dependencies

[Andrew Beekhof]

2011/9/8 Pádraig Brady <P at draigbrady.com>:
> On 09/08/2011 01:18 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> Sorry, but there's just no way anything like this is going to be
>> accepted in fedora, rhel or upstream.
>> If the packaging of cluster-glue-libs is too granular, the correct
>> approach is to create additional subpackages - not to copy half of the
>> project into pacemaker.
>
> OK thanks Andrew.
> Yes I agree that's a better approach.
> At least the proof of concept SRPM helps define
> where this split might be made.

At a guess, you probably want libplumb in a package by itself.
If there are one or two other functions we can consider copying just those.