[Pacemaker] Running two clusters on same node

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Med Hmici <medhmici at yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> First thank you for getting back to me.
> The strategy is for a split controlled upgrade. Thus having to momentarily
> create an isolated cluster, with different software setup, before taking
> over the official port. This is at an early stage of thinking. So I might
> have missed some important concepts...
> Did I miss anything along the way?

Basically Pacemaker doesn't support this.
Even if you manage to have two instances of corosync running, both are
listening at the same location for local communication from things
like pacemaker

>
> Mo.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>
> To: Med Hmici <medhmici at yahoo.ca>; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Sent: Sunday, October 2, 2011 9:26:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Running two clusters on same node
>
> Why would you want to do this?
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Med Hmici <medhmici at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to find out a recipe to setup a node part of clusters. However,
>> I
>> only want the node to be active in one cluster at a time. I'd like to do
>> this all programatically, that is with without yast or such (the server
>> doesn't have X installed).
>>
>> Sorry if this is a dummy question. I'm trying to get my mind around some
>> concepts that are new to me.
>>
>> Mo.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs:
>> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>>
>>
>
>
>