[Pacemaker] Please teach it about handling of the unmanaged resource in environment setting placement-strategy.

[Yuusuke Iida]

Hi, Yan

I read a cord of pengine.
By all appearance, as for the resource becoming "unmanaged failed", an 
allotment does not seem to be performed.
Is the recognition that an allotment is not performed as for the 
"unmanaged failed" resource that failed in stop right?
Does it mean that capacity of the node is not used if not assigned?

Regards,
Yuusuke

(2011/07/26 16:12), Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
> Hi, Yan
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I used the function of placement-strategy and found movement to be worried about.
>
> There is node "act3" which the resource that became the unmanaged state starts.
>
> The resource that started then in node "act1" broke down and moved.
>
> I hoped that this inoperative resource moved to node "sby1", but it was not
> carried out.
>
> Is the movement that a resource with other capacity moves in the node that the
> resource of the unmanaged state meets capacity right as specifications?
>
> I want you to revise it to decide placement in consideration of the capacity of
> the unmanaged resource.
>
> I attach crm_report when a problem happened.
>
> Best Regards,
> Yuusuke
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

-- 
----------------------------------------
METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD

Yuusuke Iida
Mail: iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp
----------------------------------------