[Pacemaker] Very strange behavior on asymmetric cluster

Serge Dubrouski sergeyfd at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 12:49:32 EDT 2011

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron at huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
> Serge Dubrouski @ 21/03/2011 13:10 -0300 dixit:
>>> What I am talking about is monitoring (probing) of a resource on a node
>>> where this resource cannot be exist.
>> As far as I understand that would require a definition of a "quorum"
>> node or another special kind of node where resource cannot exist.
>> Figuring out a a such role from location/collocation rules seems to
>> complex to me. The idea of quorum node was abandoned by long ago in
>> favor for some other features/project that Lars mentioned earlier.
> There is already a location rule, and a minus infinite value.
> Is that value being used dynamically ? If not, that could be used
> as a marker for "this (resource) can not possibly run in this node"
> so monitoring is not necesary ?

It is used dynamically quite often. For example moving resource out of
one node creates a such location rule. Does it mean that along with
moving resource Pacemaker has to stop monitoring it on the left node?
I don't think so.

> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron at huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker

Serge Dubrouski.

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list