[Pacemaker] Quorum contradiction?

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I'm running my first Corosync based cluster and I'm seeing
> something odd (maybe I didn't get it right), Pacemaker tells me that
> two nodes are present, but corosync gives me 0 votos a no nodes, is
> this expected (corosync delegating functions to pacemaker)?
>
> test2:~ # rpm -q pacemaker corosync
> pacemaker-1.1.5-1.1
> corosync-1.3.0-1.1
>
> test2:~ # crm_mon -1
> ============
> Last updated: Wed Jun 22 08:38:33 2011
> Stack: openais
> Current DC: test1 - partition with quorum
> Version: 1.1.5-ecb6baaf7fc091b023d6d4ba7e0fce26d32cf5c8
> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
> 0 Resources configured.
> ============
>
> Online: [ test2 test1 ]
>
> test2:~ # corosync-quorumtool -l

Pacemaker is not using the (still yet to be thoroughly integration
tested) quorum logic in corosync.
Therefor corosync-quorumtool is not the right tool to be consulting.
Try crm_node


> Nodeid     Name
> test2:~ # corosync-quorumtool -s
> Version:          1.3.0
> Nodes:            0
> Ring ID:          0
> Quorum type:      (null)
> Quorate:          Yes
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Ciro Iriarte
> http://cyruspy.wordpress.com
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>