[Pacemaker] fencing to recover from failed resources

[Florian Haas]

On 2011-01-13 13:16, Bart Coninckx wrote:
> On Thursday 13 January 2011 11:58:03 Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> On 2011-01-13T11:48:41, Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx at telenet.be> wrote:
>>> I notice that you work Novell, this is a SLES11SP1 installation so if the
>>> resource agent for Xen is faulty I guess you know about it?
>>
>> Yes, I think I'd know about it. The Xen RA doesn't have any known bugs
>> at the moment, but make sure that all maintenance updates are applied.
>>
>> In case you want some external validation of your cluster configuration,
>> you can either ask our support folks (if your support level is high
>> enough), or talk to LIN:BIT, they offer a cluster health check service
>> http://www.linbit.com/en/products-services/drbd-consulting/ at a very
>> affordable price.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Lars
> 
> I just compared it to the one in SLES10 and it seems to have hardly changed. 
> I'm pushing the customer to get (pay for) Novell support after the initial 
> trial period and proof of concept, not in the least to have clarity about 
> things like this. 
> Wasn't aware that Linbit provided this service as well, apart from DRBD 
> clusters.

We provide full cluster stack consultancy regardless of whether you use
DRBD or not. And thanks to lmb for the plug. :)

Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110113/c5ac8b45/attachment-0004.sig>