[Pacemaker] "Stretched" cluster support

[Valentin Vidic]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:14:09AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Introduction: At LPC 2010, we discussed (once more) that a key feature
> for pacemaker in 2011 would be improved support for multi-site clusters;
> by multi-site, we mean two (or more) sites with a local cluster each,
> and some higher level entity coordinating fail-over across these (as
> opposed to "stretched" clusters, where a single cluster might spawn the
> whole campus in the city).

Sorry for the digression, but what is the current support and plans
for the "stretched" cluster scenario (e.g. two locations, no reliable
fencing, some network redundancy)?

-- 
Valentin