[Pacemaker] ifstatus OCF RA

Florian Haas florian.haas at linbit.com
Mon Feb 21 20:29:19 UTC 2011


On 02/21/2011 08:00 PM, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> Hello *,
> 
> as the various ocf:*:ping[d] incarnations don't meet my specific needs,

May I ask why and how?

> I 
> wrote a small RA using ethtool to detect a network link failure, in order to 
> trigger a failover.

Well, what if the link is up but there's an upstream problem? I've
always liked how ocf:pacemaker:ping actually monitors connectivity to an
upstream IP, which covers both immediate link failure and upstream
problems. Similar to how in active/backup bonding, you can fail over
based on the status of an ARP request, rather than MII link status.

Your thoughts?
Florian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110221/744af11c/attachment-0004.sig>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list