[Pacemaker] CMAN - Pacemaker - Porftpd setup

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Florian Haas <florian at hastexo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Bensch, Kobus
> <kobus.bensch at bauerservices.co.uk> wrote:
>> 2.) I pasted the outcome here http://pastebin.com/uPcHiM4p
>
> So, you should be seeing lines akin to the following in your logs:
>
> ERROR: clone_rsc_colocation_rh: Cannot interleave clone ActiveFTPSite
> and WebIP because they do not support the same number of resources per
> node
> ERROR: clone_rsc_colocation_rh: Cannot interleave clone ActiveFTPSite
> and WebIP because they do not support the same number of resources per
> node
>
> Andrew: this configuration appears to come from CFS
> (http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s06.html);
> that documentation seems like it needs to be updated. Either one would
> need to disable interleaving (which is now enabled by default, iirc),
> or set clone-node-max=”1” on the IPaddr2 clone.

I will likely give that document a major overhaul for fedora 17.
I wonder if the IPaddr2 clone will behave correctly with
clone-node-max=”1” (ie. do the number of buckets get reduced when its
stopped on a node)

>
> Interestingly, in 1.1.5, setting interleave=false on both clones in
> the given CIB does _not_ seem to fix the problem (ptest still
> complains about "cannot interleave"), only setting clone-node-max=1 on
> the IPaddr2 clone does. Am I doing something wrong, or does this look
> like a pengine bug?

Sounds like a bug.  Could someone create a bugzilla for that please?