[Pacemaker] Ordering Sets of Resources within Groups

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Ulf <mopp at gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>>> Is there a difference between? Or is in both cases the score 0?
>>> order start-order 0: ( A B ) C D ( E F )
>>> and
>>> order start-order : ( A B ) C D ( E F )
>
>>Even if the latter was legal syntax, which I'm pretty sure its
>>shouldn't be, it would be equivalent to the first form
> Both syntax work with pacemaker-1.1.5, so someone might "fix" this.
>
>> Look up the meaning of score=0 for ordering constraints.
> I tried the following, but none of them triggered the other resources after starting start_trigger:
> order start-order1 inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F )

the one above should work

> order start-order1 -inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F )
> order start-order1 +inf: start_trigger ( A B ) C D ( E F )
>
> Would you be so kind to give me the final hint? I think I did it the same way as mentioned in the documentation "Example 6.12", but it seems not to work for me.
>
> Cheers,
> Ulf
> --
> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>