[Pacemaker] Clone resource dependency issue - undesired restart of dependent resources
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Apr 11 08:54:03 UTC 2011
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Christoph Bartoschek
<ponto at pontohonk.de> wrote:
> Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
>
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/4/4 Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek at gmx.de>:
>>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 2011/4/1 Christoph Bartoschek
>>>>> <bartoschek at gmx.de>:
>>>>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You didn't mention a version number... I think you'll be happier with
>>>>>>> 1.1.5 (I recall fixing a similar issue).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see a similar problem with 1.1.5. I have a two node NFS server
>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following happens:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. The resources run on node A.
>>>>>> 2. I put node A into standby.
>>>>>> 3. The resources are migrated to node B.
>>>>>> 4. I make node A online again.
>>>>>> 5. The services are stopped on node B.
>>>>>> 6. The services are started on node B.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my opinion starting node A again should not cause the services to
>>>>>> stop and start again.
>>>>>
>>>>> No argument there. Can you include a crm_report archive covering the
>>>>> time between 1 and 6 please?
>>>>
>>>> Could you please show me how the call to crm_report should look to give
>>>> you the information you are interessted in?
>>>
>>> crm_report -h should contain sufficient information
>>
>> I hope the resulting file is ok. I called crm_report this way:
>>
>> crm_report -f "2011-04-04 12:15:00" \
>> -t "2011-04-04 12:18:00" \
>> -n "laplace ries"
>>
>
> Is the report enough or is more information needed?
Should be enough.
I just checked the latest 1.1 code and the clones are no longer restarted.
For the rest, you can get the result you want by using 0 for the score
in your ordering constraints.
The current behavior is a bug, the services should only restart if the
clone instance on the same node restarts.
Question though, do the nfs clients need to restart if the server
component does?
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list