[Pacemaker] Impossible to add a 4th node to a cluster

[Pavlos Parissis]

On 28 October 2010 16:09, Guillaume Chanaud
<guillaume.chanaud at connecting-nature.com> wrote:
>  Hello,
>
> i have a cluster of two master/slave drbd server running into a vlan
> (machines are dedicated servers)
> (filer1 and filer2)
> I added a third node to the cluster (a "blank node" for the moment)
> correctly
> (server1)
> When i add a 4th node to the cluster (which is a "mirror" of server1)
> (server2)
> this node start as standalone...Here is the message.log :
>
> Oct 28 15:59:27 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or
> left the membership and a new membership was formed.
> Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] notice:
> pcmk_peer_update: Transitional membership event on ring 945392: memb=1,
> new=0, lost=0
> Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] info: pcmk_peer_update:
> memb: server2 16820416
> Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] notice:
> pcmk_peer_update: Stable membership event on ring 945392: memb=1, new=0,
> lost=0
> Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] info: pcmk_peer_update:
> MEMB: server2 16820416
> Oct 28 15:59:28 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [TOTEM ] A processor joined or
> left the membership and a new membership was formed.
> Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] notice:
> pcmk_peer_update: Transitional membership event on ring 945416: memb=1,
> new=0, lost=0
> Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] info: pcmk_peer_update:
> memb: server2 16820416
> Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] notice:
> pcmk_peer_update: Stable membership event on ring 945416: memb=1, new=0,
> lost=0
> Oct 28 15:59:29 ns209045 corosync[16543]:   [pcmk  ] info: pcmk_peer_update:
> MEMB: server2 16820416
>
> [...] Message repeat many many times
>
> Now i stop the server1, and i start the server2...server2 start correctly
> and is added to the cluster...but when
> i want to start server1, same thing happens...(so things are inverted but
> result is the same...when i start one the serverX, the other can't start...)
>
> My corosync.conf is configured in broadcast, not multicast....I have lots of
> problem with multicast because lots of briged VM on the vlan
> doesn't see the multicast packets, or doesn't join the multicast group
> correctly...
>
> Any hint on this ??

corosync and auth files are the same on server2?