[Pacemaker] Failover domains?

Pavlos Parissis pavlos.parissis at gmail.com
Tue Oct 26 08:10:23 UTC 2010


On 25 October 2010 19:50, David Quenzler <quenzler at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there a way to limit failover behavior to a subset of cluster nodes
> or pin a resource to a node?
>
>
Yes, there is a way.

Make sure you have a asymmetric cluster by setting symmetric-cluster to
false
and then configure accordingly your location constraints in order to have
the failover domains as you wish.

Here is en example from my cluster where I have 3 nodes and 2 resource
group. Each resource group have unique primary node but both of them have
shared secondary node.

location PrimaryNode-pbx_service_01 pbx_service_01 200: node-01
location PrimaryNode-pbx_service_02 pbx_service_02 200: node-02

location SecondaryNode-pbx_service_01 pbx_service_01 10: node-03
location SecondaryNode-pbx_service_02 pbx_service_02 10: node-03


Cheers,
Pavlos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20101026/66455e46/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list