[Pacemaker] is recovery from link failure now automatic?
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Tue Oct 19 13:28:51 UTC 2010
Dan Frincu writes:
> You can take a look at the following and see if it helps
>
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2010-October/041473.html
if i understood correctly, conclusion from the thread is
Active/active rings seem to work well enough - but they do not recover
without manual intervention.
i'll check again one year from now if corosync then would not require
manual babysitting, which in my opinion should not be a component of
a "high availability" solution.
-- juha
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list