[Pacemaker] Active / Active pacemaker configuration advice

[Marko Potocnik]

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff <misch at clusterbau.com
> wrote:

> On Thursday 25 November 2010 08:56:21 Marko Potocnik wrote:
> (...)
> > The order constraint does not affect the IP migration strategy in case of
> > service failure. I agree that I missed it, but I does not affect the
> > current behavior of IP resource in case of service failure.
>
>
> Perhaps it is better if you describe what you want to acchieve so we could
> help with the solution:
>
> - You want to have a service running on two nodes so tha failover happens
> faster.
>
> - In case of one failure of the service on one node you want the IP address
> to
> move to the other node.
>
> Is that all?
>

Pretty much, service which failed should also be restarted, so
that fail-back is possible.
And that is all :)


>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> Guardinistr. 63
> 81375 München
>
> Tel: (0163) 172 50 98
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20101125/daf76480/attachment-0002.htm>