[Pacemaker] colocation that doesn't

[Alan Jones]

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> Then -2 obviously isn't big enough is it.

I need a value between and not including -inf and -2 that will work.
All the values I've tried don't, so I'm open to suggestions.

> Please read and understand:
>   http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-resource-colocation.html

The way I read the with-rsc description it is in direct conflict with
your comment from Nov. 11th (below),
so I'm truly confused.

>> colocation X-Y -2: X Y
>> colocation Y-X -2: Y X
>the second one is implied by the first and is therefore redundant

> For how colocation constraints actually work instead of inventing your own rules.

I'm interested in inventing rules, I'm trying to express the
constraints of my application.
So far, I have not been able to do so.
Alan