[Pacemaker] problems with shutdown order of master/slave resources

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Nikola Ciprich
<extmaillist at linuxbox.cz> wrote:
>> well, I was using 1.1.3 for a while, but I reverted to 1.0 line for stability reasons.
>> furthermore, from what andrew said, 1.1.4 needs newer glib2 which complicates
>> things for us conservative people even more :)
>> but if the bug is really fixed in 1.1.4, it could be possible to backport the patch.
>> i'll have a look to mercurial, and report.
> Hmm,
> I guess it could  be this patch:
> 10339:3d2a39c03666
> but it doesn't apply cleanly and fixing it will certainly require somewhat deeper
> knowledge of pacemaker  internals...
> Andrew, do You think fix could get into 1.0 branch as well?

yes, but probably not for .10

> If it's the one
> I need at all?

quite likely

> n.
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
> LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
> 28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava
>
> tel.:   +420 596 603 142
> fax:    +420 596 621 273
> mobil:  +420 777 093 799
>
> www.linuxbox.cz
>
> mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
> email servis: servis at linuxbox.cz
> -------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>