[Pacemaker] [Question]About the recovery procedure from the state that a node was divided.

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> > &#65533;Step3) Make "/var/lib/heartbeat/crm/" clean.
>> > &#65533; &#65533; &#65533; &#65533;Make it clean in all nodes
>> > &#65533;Step4) Start all four nodes.
>> > &#65533;Step5) Send cib information to a cluster.
>> > &#65533;Step6) A cluster is rebuilt.
>> >
>> >
>> > We do not want to take the second method.
>> > Because, all resources stop when we take second method.
>> >
>> > Is not there a problem in the first method that we took?
>>
>> Step 3 should not be necessary, but otherwise there is nothing wrong
>> with the first method.
>> That usage is essentially what it was designed for.
>
> Really?
>
> If there is not a procedure of Step3, I think that the bug that I reported before is easy to occur.
>  * http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2508
>
> I think that this bug influences that a procedure of step3 is necessary.

Hopefully we'll get that bug fixed soon :-)

>
>
>> Hope that answers your question.
>
> Thanks.
> If a procedure of Step3 is not necessary, I think that it is splendid.

That is my goal.  If there are any bugs that require this, lets make
sure we get them fixed.

> I examine a problem a little more and report it.
>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
>
> --- Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:44 AM,  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We tested it about the recovery procedure from the state that a node was divided.
>> > (As for four nodes, three nodes are active, and one node is constitution of the standby.)
>> >
>> > It is the restoration from a state divided by two nodes that we set in
>> no-quorum-policy="freeze".
>> >
>> > The resource keeps a state as is after it was divided in the case of freeze setting.
>> > (We tested it using special RA to evade that recognition of the division of the node of ccm
>> was late
>> > in Heartbeat.)
>> >
>> >
>> > We confirmed some patterns to recovery.
>> > And we thought that the next method was desirable.
>> >
>> > * The first method. (By this method, all resources do not stop.)
>> > &#65533;Step1) Stop all the divided nodes of the one side.
>> > &#65533;Step2) Break off the problem that a node divided.(For example, change a network card.)
>> > &#65533;Step3) Make "/var/lib/heartbeat/crm/" clean.
>> > &#65533; &#65533; &#65533; &#65533;Make it clean in the node that stopped.
>> > &#65533;Step4) Start two nodes that stopped.
>> > &#65533;Step5) A cluster is rebuilt.
>> >
>> > * The second method. (But, all resources stop when we take this method)
>> > &#65533;Step1) Stop all four nodes.
>> > &#65533;Step2) Break off the problem that a node divided.(For example, change a network card.)
>> > &#65533;Step3) Make "/var/lib/heartbeat/crm/" clean.
>> > &#65533; &#65533; &#65533; &#65533;Make it clean in all nodes
>> > &#65533;Step4) Start all four nodes.
>> > &#65533;Step5) Send cib information to a cluster.
>> > &#65533;Step6) A cluster is rebuilt.
>> >
>> >
>> > We do not want to take the second method.
>> > Because, all resources stop when we take second method.
>> >
>> > Is not there a problem in the first method that we took?
>>
>> Step 3 should not be necessary, but otherwise there is nothing wrong
>> with the first method.
>> That usage is essentially what it was designed for.
>>
>> Hope that answers your question.
>>
>> >
>> > Is there a method to recommend by a recovery method of the division from freeze setting as
>> community?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Hideo Yamauchi.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> > Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>