[Pacemaker] problems with shutdown order of master/slave resources

[Nikola Ciprich]

> I'd build it as a parallel package, f.e. glib224, with includes in
> /usr/include/glib-2.24 and .so symlinks in /usr/lib/glib-2.24. Thus
> you'll have everything in directories (separate from a "main" glib2
> package) which you should manually supply to pacemaker during build, and
> all other packages are unaffected because they are linked with older
> glib which is installed in parallel.
I know, but I'm still not very happy about using development branch :(
but if it won't be other choice, I'll certainly do it this way...

> 
> Of course you may hit some problems which solely depend on how much glib
> headers are relocatable.
> 
> ...
> 
> And you use 2.6.35 on EL5.
> I wouldn't say this is too conservative. ;)
yes, but this is exception only for one system and it's for stability reasons..
DLM/lockfs/OCFS, clvmd and few other things I need are pretty unusable
with older kernels, 2.6.35 behaves much better here..


> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis at linuxbox.cz
-------------------------------------