[Pacemaker] IP address does not failover on a new test cluster

[Jayakrishnan]

Hiii all,

I guess it is necessary to "ignore" the no-quorum-policy. Because if quorum
is enabled the pacemaker will run resources iff more than half of the nodes
are available... In a two node cluster it is pointless!!!!!

I have specified to run " crm configure property no-quorum-policy=ignore "
in my early post..

But I dont know it is not in the mail!!!! sorry though!!!!


-- 
Regards,

Jayakrishnan. L

Visit:
www.foralllinux.blogspot.com
www.jayakrishnan.bravehost.com



On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Ruiyuan Jiang <Ruiyuan_Jiang at liz.com>wrote:
>
>>  Thanks, Vadym
>>
>>
>>
>> This time it failed over to another node. For two nodes cluster, does the
>> cluster have to set to “no-quorum-policy=ignore” to failover or work
>> correctly?
>>
>>
> I can't say it better myself:
>
>
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>
> two-node cluster only has quorum when both nodes are running, which is no
> longer the case for our
> cluster. This would normally make the creation of a two-node cluster
> pointless, however it is possible to
> control how Pacemaker behaves when quorum is lost. In particular, we can
> tell the cluster to simply ignore
> quorum altogether.
>
> crm configure property no-quorum-policy=ignore
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>



-- 
Regards,

Jayakrishnan. L

Visit:
www.foralllinux.blogspot.com
www.jayakrishnan.bravehost.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20100519/62f3e1b7/attachment-0001.htm>