[Pacemaker] Question about Dual Primary DRBD + OCFS2

[Andrew Beekhof]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:33 PM,  <rvm at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi and thanks for you answer.
> Here my hb_report with 2 tests :
> * node standby / node online = Inconsistent drbd (resolved by drbdadm verify or reboot of the node)
> * ifdown / kill of dlm/corosync = instant reboot => I can't find any trace of this problem exept my screen dump.
> I hope you'll see something interresting in my logs.

Oh, debian i686. Figures.
You'll need to rebuild the packages yourself, the ones from Madkiss'
repo don't seem to work for i686.

>
> Thanks you again for your help,
> Regards
>
>
> ----- Mail Original -----
> De: "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>
> À: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
> Envoyé: Mardi 23 Mars 2010 20h12:58 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
> Objet: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about Dual Primary DRBD + OCFS2
>
> We'd need a stack trace, that screen dump doesn't help much I'm afraid.
> Try using hb_report to grab the logs etc.  It also includes backtraces
> from any cores it finds.
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:55 PM,  <rvm at free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some tests today...
>> If I switch off my network interface (ifdown eth0) or if i kill (-9) corosync, i've got a segfault of dlm_controld and the node reboot.
>> Is it normal ? My tests are too hard ?
>>
>> Thanks a lot ;-)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> ----- Mail Original -----
>> De: rvm at free.fr
>> À: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> Envoyé: Lundi 22 Mars 2010 18h03:49 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
>> Objet: [Pacemaker] Question about Dual Primary DRBD + OCFS2
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following this doc http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Dual_Primary_DRBD_%2B_OCFS2, I've just installed 2 nodes (with some minors adjustements) and now I'm testing my setup.
>> If I set one node in standby and bring it online again, the other node sees this node "Inconsistent". The node just back from standby mode is UpToDate for him.
>> I've not this problem when I reboot a node (reboot).
>> I think that the problem is (from my log) :
>> ERROR: r0: Called drbdadm -c /etc/drbd.conf secondary r0
>> State change failed: (-12) Device is held open by someone
>>
>> I've no STONITH system :-( Is it a problem for my tests ?
>>
>> Thanks to all, sorry for my english.
>> Regards.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
>