[Pacemaker] About replacement of clone and handling of the fail number of times.

[Andrew Beekhof]

2010/3/24  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> So if I can summarize, you're saying that clnUMdummy02 should not be
>> allowed to run on srv01 because the combined number of failures is 6
>> (and clnUMdummy02 is a non-unique clone).
>>
>> And that the current behavior is that clnUMdummy02 continues to run.
>>
>> Is that an accurate summary?
>
> Yes.
>
>> If so, then I agree its a bug.  Could you create a bugzilla entry for it please?
>
> I understood.
> I register this problem in Bugzilla.

Thanks

> How about my next question?
> Is the difference of the replacement of the clone in N1 and N4 specifications?
>
>>Of a clone rising in a N1(srv01) node at the time of "globally-unique=false" is replacing it right?
>>In addition, is it right movement that replacement does not happen even if a clone breaks down in a
> N4(srv04) node?

Do you mean: why is the clone on srv01 always $clone:0 but on srv02
its sometimes $clone:0 and sometimes $clone:1 ?