[Pacemaker] Resource-Monitoring with an "On Fail"-Action

Tom Tux tomtux80 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 18 13:15:07 UTC 2010 

Hi Dejan

hb_report -V says:
cluster-glue: 1.0.2 (b75bd738dc09263a578accc69342de2cb2eb8db6)

I've opened a case by Novell. They will fix this problem with updating
to the newest cluster-glue-release.

Could it be, that I have another configuration-issue in my
cluster-config? I think with the following setting, the resource
should be monitored:

...
...
primitive MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource lsb:mysql-monitor-agent \
        meta migration-threshold="3" \
        op monitor interval="10s" timeout="20s" on-fail="restart"
op_defaults $id="op_defaults-options" \
        on-fail="restart" \
        enabled="true"
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
        expected-quorum-votes="2" \
        dc-version="1.0.6-c48e3360eb18c53fd68bb7e7dbe39279ccbc0354" \
        cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
        stonith-enabled="true" \
        no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
        stonith-action="reboot" \
        last-lrm-refresh="1268838090"
...
...


And when I look the last-run-time with "crm_mon -fort1", then it results me:
   MySQL_Server_Resource: migration-threshold=3
    + (32) stop: last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17 10:49:55 2010'
last-run='Wed Mar 17 10:49:55 2010' exec-time=5060ms queue-time=0ms
rc=0 (ok)
    + (40) start: last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17 11:09:06 2010'
last-run='Wed Mar 17 11:09:06 2010' exec-time=4080ms queue-time=0ms
rc=0 (ok)
    + (41) monitor: interval=20000ms last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17
11:09:10 2010' last-run='Wed Mar 17 11:09:10 2010' exec-time=20ms
queue-time=0ms rc=0 (ok)

And the results above was yesterday....

Thanks for your help.
Kind regards,
Tom



2010/3/18 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm>:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:38:47PM +0100, Tom Tux wrote:
>> Hi Dejan
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>>
>> I'm using this cluster with the packages from the HAE
>> (HighAvailability-Extension)-Repository from SLES11. Therefore, is it
>> possible, to upgrade the cluster-glue from source?
>
> Yes, though I don't think that any SLE11 version has this bug.
> When was your version released? What does hb_report -V say?
>
>> I think, the better
>> way is to wait for updates in the hae-repository from novell. Or do
>> you have experience, upgrading the cluster-glue from source (even if
>> it is installed with zypper/rpm)?
>>
>> Do you know, when the HAE-Repository will be upgraded?
>
> Can't say. Best would be if you talk to Novell about the issue.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dejan
>
>> Thanks a lot.
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/17 Dejan Muhamedagic <dejanmm at fastmail.fm>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:57:16AM +0100, Tom Tux wrote:
>> >> Hi Dominik
>> >>
>> >> The problem is, that the cluster does not do the monitor-action every
>> >> 20s. The last time, when he did the action was at 09:21. And now we
>> >> have 10:37:
>> >
>> > There was a serious bug in some cluster-glue packages. What
>> > you're experiencing sounds like that. I can't say which
>> > packages (probably sth like 1.0.1, they were never released). At
>> > any rate, I'd suggest upgrading to cluster-glue 1.0.3.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Dejan
>> >
>> >>  MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource: migration-threshold=3
>> >>     + (479) stop: last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17 09:21:28 2010'
>> >> last-run='Wed Mar 17 09:21:28 2010' exec-time=3010ms queue-time=0ms
>> >> rc=0 (ok)
>> >>     + (480) start: last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17 09:21:31 2010'
>> >> last-run='Wed Mar 17 09:21:31 2010' exec-time=3010ms queue-time=0ms
>> >> rc=0 (ok)
>> >>     + (481) monitor: interval=10000ms last-rc-change='Wed Mar 17
>> >> 09:21:34 2010' last-run='Wed Mar 17 09:21:34 2010' exec-time=20ms
>> >> queue-time=0ms rc=0 (ok)
>> >>
>> >> If I restart the whole cluster, then the new returncode (exit99 or
>> >> exit4) will be saw by the cluster-monitor.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2010/3/17 Dominik Klein <dk at in-telegence.net>:
>> >> > Hi Tom
>> >> >
>> >> > have a look at the logs and see whether the monitor op really returns
>> >> > 99. (grep for the resource-id). If so, I'm not sure what the cluster
>> >> > does with rc=99. As far as I know, rc=4 would be status=failed (unknown
>> >> > actually).
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards
>> >> > Dominik
>> >> >
>> >> > Tom Tux wrote:
>> >> >> Thanks for your hint.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've configured an lsb-resource like this (with migration-threshold):
>> >> >>
>> >> >> primitive MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource lsb:mysql-monitor-agent \
>> >> >>         meta target-role="Started" migration-threshold="3" \
>> >> >>         op monitor interval="10s" timeout="20s" on-fail="restart"
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have now modified the init-script "/etc/init.d/mysql-monitor-agent",
>> >> >> to exit with a returncode not equal "0" (example exit 99), when the
>> >> >> monitor-operation is querying the status. But the cluster does not
>> >> >> recognise a failed monitor-action. Why this behaviour? For the
>> >> >> cluster, everything seems ok.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> node1:/ # showcores.sh MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource
>> >> >> Resource                             Score     Node     Stickiness
>> >> >> #Fail    Migration-Threshold
>> >> >> MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource          -1000000  node1 100        0        3
>> >> >> MySQL_MonitorAgent_Resource          100       node2 100        0        3
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I also saw, that the "last-run"-entry (crm_mon -fort1) for this
>> >> >> resource is not up-to-date. For me it seems, that the monitor-action
>> >> >> does not occurs every 10 seconds. Why? Any hints for this behaviour?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks a lot.
>> >> >> Tom
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2010/3/16 Dominik Klein <dk at in-telegence.net>:
>> >> >>> Tom Tux wrote:
>> >> >>>> Hi
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I've have a question about the resource-monitoring:
>> >> >>>> I'm monitoring an ip-resource every 20 seconds. I have configured the
>> >> >>>> "On Fail"-action with "restart". This works fine. If the
>> >> >>>> "monitor"-operation fails, then the resource will be restartet.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> But how can I define this resource, to migrate to the other node, if
>> >> >>>> the resource still fails after 10 restarts? Is this possible? How will
>> >> >>>> the "failcount" interact with this scenario?
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> In the documentation I read, that the resource-"fail_count" will
>> >> >>>> encrease every time, when the resource restarts. But I can't see this
>> >> >>>> fail_count.
>> >> >>> Look at the meta attribute "migration-threshold".
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regards
>> >> >>> Dominik
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Pacemaker mailing list
>> >> > Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pacemaker mailing list
>> >> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pacemaker mailing list
>> > Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list
>> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>

More information about the Pacemaker mailing list