[Pacemaker] Problem : By colocations limitation, the resource appointment of the combination does not become effective.

[Andrew Beekhof]

2010/3/17  <renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Please give my question an answer.

I've been extremely busy.
Sometimes I defer more complex questions until I have time to give
them my full attention.

>
> Best Regards,
> Hideo Yamauchi.
>
> --- renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> Thank you for comment.
>>
>> I asked next question before.
>>
>>   http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/61484
>>
>> I guessed from your this answer.
>> When I use cib.xml of the answer of before, is the limitation that it combined a start of
>> clnPingd
>> with after a node rebooted unrealizable?

I don't really understand the question here.

>>
>> Limitation of before :
>> >  <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
>> > with-rsc="clnPingd" score="1000"/>
>>
>> This limitation :
>> >  <rsc_colocation id="rsc_colocation01-1" rsc="UMgroup01"
>> > with-rsc="clnPingd" score="INFINITY"/>
>>
>> Is there a description method of cib.xml letting both limitation function at the same time?

What would that achieve?